President elections are protected With Jammers
Once again Ukrainians had to choose a president who will lead them to prosperity and as usual some candidates did everything possible to win, even if it was against the law. In addition to ”ordinary” ways of falsification that were used in 2004, improved ways of interfering into voting process took place.
It is well-known fact that the most widely spread method of falsification at any elections is bribing of voters. But this technique has one big disadvantage, there is a possibility that voter will take money and still vote for another candidate. It was absolutely impossible to find out the voter’s choice until now. Today’s equipment allowed a person to get full control over the voting process of another person with the help of various spy tools. So some political forces decided to set small secret wireless cams on the bribed voters to receive real time video from voting cabin and so got the opportunity to check whether the voter made the “right” decision. Also for these purposes mobile phones that can be used for video calls were used.
Knowing all this, other parties equipped their representatives with special phone jammers to jam 2.4 GHz frequency and thus to prevent opponents from using wireless cams. Also GSM and 3G jammers were used to jam all cell phones at the voting cabins. In the vast majority of cases only one jammer was used. This universal jammer not only blocks all those bands but also is extremely compact so there were no problems with discreet usage of it.
As we can see, blockers become more and more popular at the post-Soviet countries. The demand for cell phonejammers is growing not only among ordinary people but also among different government officials and organizations. In winter 2010 blockers were used at the elections, in spring 2010 cell phonejammers are supposed to be used during exams at schools. What’s next?
Source text can be found at that page.